Update
The Oxford Biblical Studies Online and Oxford Islamic Studies Online have retired. Content you previously purchased on Oxford Biblical Studies Online or Oxford Islamic Studies Online has now moved to Oxford Reference, Oxford Handbooks Online, Oxford Scholarship Online, or What Everyone Needs to Know®. For information on how to continue to view articles visit the subscriber services page.
Dismiss

Overview

denying the antecedent

Return to overview »

You are looking at 1-5 of 5 entries

View:

affirming the antecedent

affirming the antecedent  

In conditional reasoning, arguing validly from a hypothetical proposition of the form If p then q that, because p therefore q. For example, given the proposition If the burglars entered by the front ...
affirming the consequent

affirming the consequent  

In conditional reasoning, arguing invalidly from a hypothetical proposition of the form If p then q that, because q therefore p. For example, given the proposition If the burglars entered by the ...
conditional reasoning

conditional reasoning  

A form of logical reasoning based on conditional statements or conditional propositions having the form If p, then q, in which p is the antecedent and q is the consequent. An example is If this ...
denying the consequent

denying the consequent  

In conditional reasoning, arguing validly from a hypothetical proposition of the form If p then q that, because q is false, therefore p is false. For example, given the proposition If the burglars ...
denying the antecedent

denying the antecedent   Reference library

Colwyn Williamson

The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2 ed.)

Reference type:
Subject Reference
Current Version:
2005
Subject:
Philosophy
Length:
90 words

To reason that, because Nazis hate Jews and John is not a Nazi, he cannot be an anti-Semite, is to commit this fallacy. In the traditional logic of terms, inferences like ‘If ...

View: