Update
The Oxford Biblical Studies Online and Oxford Islamic Studies Online have retired. Content you previously purchased on Oxford Biblical Studies Online or Oxford Islamic Studies Online has now moved to Oxford Reference, Oxford Handbooks Online, Oxford Scholarship Online, or What Everyone Needs to Know®. For information on how to continue to view articles visit the subscriber services page.
Dismiss

Related Content

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Science and technology
  • Earth Sciences and Geography

GO

Show Summary Details

Overview

third space theory


Quick Reference

E. Soja (1996) proposes a different way of thinking about space and spatiality. First and second spaces are two different, and possibly conflicting, spatial groupings where people interact physically and socially: such as home (everyday knowledge) and school (academic knowledge). Third spaces are the in-between, or hybrid, spaces, where the first and second spaces work together to generate a new third space. ‘Soja is anxious to avoid the common dualities of the social and the individual, culture/nature, production/reproduction, the real versus the imagined, (which pervade geographical analysis, arguing “there is always another way”’ Wharf (2006) PHG 30, 819). Linehan and Gruffudd (2004) TIBG 29, 1 apply the term to the tented camps set up in inter-war Wales for retraining miners (‘isolated from their wives and families, and separated from the rural society around them’); and, in a cheeky usage, Starbucks propose their premises as ‘third space experience: the place between work and home’. See Moje et al. (2004) Reading Res. Qt. 39, 1 on third space in an educational context.


Reference entries