The Oxford Biblical Studies Online and Oxford Islamic Studies Online have retired. Content you previously purchased on Oxford Biblical Studies Online or Oxford Islamic Studies Online has now moved to Oxford Reference, Oxford Handbooks Online, Oxford Scholarship Online, or What Everyone Needs to Know®. For information on how to continue to view articles visit the subscriber services page.

Related Content

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Law


Show Summary Details


legal positivism

Quick Reference

An approach to law that rejects natural law and contends that the law as laid down (positum) should be kept separate – for the purpose of study and analysis – from the law as it ought morally to be. In other words, a clear distinction must be drawn between “ought” (that which is morally desirable) and “is” (that which actually exists). The theory is associated especially with the thought of Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832), John Austin (1790–1859), H. L. A. Hart (1907–1992), and Hans Kelsen (1881–1973), who differ from one another in important respects but generally adhere to the above separability thesis. In addition, legal positivists normally adopt the so-called social fact thesis (that legal validity is a function of pedigree or related social facts) and the conventionality thesis (that social facts giving rise to legal validity are authoritative by virtue of social convention). See analytical jurisprudence; pure theory of law; utilitarianism. See also interpretive theory of law.

Subjects: Law

Reference entries

View all reference entries »